|
|
|
@ -47095,11 +47095,6 @@ Spring distribution. In all likelihood, you shouldn't ever need to implement you |
|
|
|
|
configuring a java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor` and wraps it in a `TaskExecutor`. |
|
|
|
|
If you need to adapt to a different kind of `java.util.concurrent.Executor`, it is |
|
|
|
|
recommended that you use a <<concurrentTaskExecutor, `ConcurrentTaskExecutor`>> instead. |
|
|
|
|
* `TimerTaskExecutor` |
|
|
|
|
This implementation uses a single `TimerTask` as its backing implementation. |
|
|
|
|
It's different from the <<syncTaskExecutor, `SyncTaskExecutor`>> in that the method |
|
|
|
|
invocations are executed in a separate thread, although they are effectively |
|
|
|
|
synchronously batched in that thread. |
|
|
|
|
* `WorkManagerTaskExecutor` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|